Modelling of IPO Underpricing in Bangladesh
Keywords:Bangladesh, Initial public offering, Initial return (IR), Market adjusted initial return (MAIR), Underpricing.
AbstractThis study shows the degree of underpricing in initial public offering in Bangladesh and the relationship of underpricing with some company specific and issue specific variables. To measure the degree of underpricing both initial return (IR) and market adjusted initial returns (MAIR) have been used. The study reveals 284% average initial return and 266% average market adjusted return for the first listing day of the IPOs for the period 2007 to 2016. Regression analysis is used to find the relationship between various predictor variables and underpricing. The regression analysis depicts that issue price, oversubscription, market return and size of the firm have significant effect on initial return. Similarly, market adjusted initial return is also influenced by issue price, oversubscription and size of the firm have significant effect over. The study found that issue size, age of the firm, floating percentage of share has very little relationship with underpricing in Bangladesh.
Acqua, A. D., Etro, L. L., Teti, E., & Murri, M. (2014). IPO underpricing and after market performance in Italy. International Journal of Finance and Banking , 1 (5), 30-45.
Bansal, R., & Khanna, A. (2012). Determinants of IPOs initial return: extreme analysis of Indian market. Journal of Financial Risk Management , 1, 68-74.
Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 1 , 15, 213-232.
Chan, K., Wang, J., & Wei, K. J. (2004). Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China. Journal of Corporate Finance , 409 – 430.
Islam, M. A., Ali, R., & Ahmad, Z. (2010). Underpricing of IPOs: the case of Bangladesh. Global Economy And Finance Journal , 3, 44-61.
Islam, M. S. (1999). The behavior of IPO underpricing in Bangladesh. Finance and Banking , 5, 87-109.
Kiymaz, H. (2000). The initial and aftermarket performance of IPOs in an emerging market: evidence from Istanbul stock exchange. Journal of Multinational Financial Management , 10 (2), 213-227.
Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. (2004). Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management , 5-37.
Robinson, R. M., Robinson, M. A., & Peng, C. C. (2004). Underpricing and IPO ownership retention. Journal of Economics and Finance , 28 (1), 132–146.
Shah, S. N., & Mehta, D. H. (2015). Initial performance of IPOs in India: EVIDENCE FROM 2010-2014. Samvad , 9, 77-86.
Sohail, M. K., & Raheman, A. (2009). Determinants of underpricing of IPOs regarding financial & non-financial firms in Pakistan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences (15), 62-73.
Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance , 43 (1), 1-19.
Welch, I. (1989). Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance , 44 (2), 421–449.
Yaakob, H., & Halim, M. N. (2016). Initial public offering underpricing performance in Malaysia (listed on main market). International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research , 7 (12), 124-133.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).